Day 2 of the NCTM

Day 2. The first session I attended was America’s Got STEM Talent. We were presented with three STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) units by three different publishers. We evaluated them according to their S, T, E, and M content and whether we would use it or not. It was helpful to have a representative from the publishing company present the units, but like everything else the quality of the presentation didn’t necessarily represent the quality of the product. In one presentation we were only shown the intro video, which took the whole presentation time (about 5 min) and we got nothing on the actual materials. The hook was great, but couldn’t judge the content. The other two were for elementary and middle school and were interesting, had good content, and were well laid out. I know this is a program that I will want to use, and I can implement either as an elective or an after school program.

Dr. Frank Wang presented an entertaining as well as informative seminar, Keys to Successful Teaching: Turning Research into Practice. He gave 5 points: 1)Provide Students with a rewarding experience, 2)Get the students actively involved, 3) Review constantly, 4) Teach in increments, 5) Test frequently and cumulatively. Dr. Wang was an apprentice under John Saxon of Saxon Publishing and managed the business after Saxon’s death. If you’re familiar with Saxon math, you can see the correlation between Wang’s philosophy of teaching and Saxon’s approach to mathematics. I adhere to Wang’s philosophy but not to how it is implemented in the Saxon text books. Dr. Wang gave recommendations for several books. I’m adding them to my Christmas reading list. I feel like the 4mat units I’ve been writing follow Wang’s 5 points fairly well. I have seen the concept of reviewing constantly modeled in my Observations through the “Bell Ringers” that start the math class. I’ll need to include that in my lesson plans when we start those.

The Rules of the Game was an interesting seminar. It was lead by a publisher consultant. The content was activities from their text books. There were three great hands-on activities for probability and geometry. Math Labs, as they were called, are great learning tools that are relatively short, but tangibly demonstrate important concepts. I don’t know how often I will be able to use them due to time constraints, so importance of concept and difficulty of the material will be two criteria I’ll use for choosing labs.

FABULOUS, was Jason Williams’ 50 Fabulous Finds for the Classroom:  links, resources, FREE computer programs and resources. You can find all his treasures on his link. Scroll down the page and check out a few. OMG it’s overwhelming! My approach will have to be to look at one, and only one, link a week to implement. My first link is Rubistar, a rubric design and resource sight.

The last seminar of the day covered the new Common Core State Standards, which should be called National not State. It is a hot political teacher topic. This looks like it is the first step to National control of the educational system. When the government gives you money, it wants a say-so in what you do. The origin of this initiative is scary and NCTM’s work to have actual math teachers involved with the development gives me hope.

It’s been an amazing couple of days. I’m getting a clearer view of how I want to teach, and I’m acquiring resources for great lessons so I’m not “re-inventing the wheel.” The biggest impact this conference has had on my vision is probable the STEM and Engineering seminars. I can so see myself implementing these type of programs in our school and community and incorporating these kind of units to build context for the math.

NCTM 2010 Regional Conf. Day1

WOW, the NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) 2010 Regional Conf. was awesome! I’m coming home with new ideas, resources, and inspiration. The first day included integrating math with engineering, something I think will work well with my Electrical Engineering background. Look around at all the engineered creations around you. Ask questions, make connections, do the math. Great resource: engineering lesson plans from an engineering perspective.
My next class was Algebra: connections with multiple representations. It is just like my MA513 class so I only stayed for 30 minutes. I’ve seen how building understanding through progressive problem solving is powerful in teaching.
I spent another half-hour in Meeting Learners’ needs in mathematics with differentiated instructional strategies. In this seminar we were presented with strategies in formative assessment, teaching, and summative assessment. Nothing new in formative assessment, but I saw how the teaching can tiered for three levels of mastery. The group with a basic level of mastery requires the teacher’s guidance and a review sheet. The instructor will spend more time with this group than any other. The group with an average level of mastery will get minimum direction and no review sheet. The instructor will spend time with this group as she sees necessary. The group with advanced mastery will be given the no review sheet and instructed to create their own learning, even creating teaching materials for the other groups. All the groups will be given the same materials with the same teaching objective, but each group will investigate it at their level. If the project is measurements, for example, all the groups will be given measuring cups, measuring spoons, pictures and water. The first group will be given instructions to investigate how many cups are in a quart, how many tablespoons are in a cup, etc. and a chart to fill out with the information. The second group will be given similar directions, but no review sheet. The third group will be told to find out the relationships and present it in an organized manner. Forms of summative assessment include KWL, journaling, Think-pair-share, mapping and Quick write. As I write lesson plans and have to accommodate ESL and IEP students this approach will be invaluable. The students will all be doing the same content, but at their particular level. I was worried about how I was going to actually make teaching at different levels work in a classroom.
I spent an hour in a Reflection session where attendees discussed the things they’re learning at the conference with respect to geometry. “Hands on” was the general consensus with noting that as little direction from the teacher actually helped with student learning.
Enough of the first day’s epiphanies, I’ll post about day 2 tomorrow.

Technology continued

I posted earlier about my technology class and the new "weapons" I have to use on my unsuspecting students. We went over student support materials and how to make those cool forms you can fill out on the computer. I had always wondered how they were made. Now I know. Well, kind of. It's a lot of steps and I didn't catch all of them. I'm going to try it out and let you know how it goes. I'll be checking out tutorials on the web for this.

As i get ready to create tests i have to think about what will really demonstrate an understanding of the concept? What questions do you ask? What testing format will lend itself best to evaluate their learning? Do i go with the standard mathematics equation test or word problems? The News letter and Power Point projects were good evaluation tools. Is that enough? I like the idea of a learning journal/blog. I guess the medium we use, paper or internet, will depend on the resources my students have.

I like the wide range of student support options I have: Youtube, Power Point,and Prezi, to name a few. I don't think the boring lecture with worksheets is my style at all. I think there are several interactive websites for math as well. Hopefully they will have technology resources available at the school I teach. What are my options if they don't? How can I get resources in the schools through the community and local businesses? I'm getting a lot of answers in my classes, but there seem to be more questions that pop up with the answers!

Standards-Base Grading (SBG)

Assessment, how? The SBGing sounds difficult, but great, until you get into the question of how is this going to be different than regular grading. It makes the kids number chasers just the same as regular assessment and it doesn't give a wholistic assessment of their knowledge; you assess each "tool," but can they discern which "tools" to use in larger problem solving situations. So I'm thinking I create a grading Rubric that has individual tool assessment as well as project assessment on it. Throw in participation, collaboration, and .... my gosh, I think my head is going to explode. I am learning so much and I see how much more I need to learn. Building with one brick at a time!

Technology in the classroom

As I progress through my technology class, I gain confidence to use this new "weapon" in my classroom. Having students create a Power Point presentations or a News publications is a real useful tool to evaluate their comprehension of the material. If they can communicate the information clearly and have fun, everyone wins.
We covered copyrights in class today which has sobered me up. There are legal restrictions to what both I and my students can use and how we use it.